20 Dec Construction Law Review
Construction Law Review – November
Please refer below to our Construction Law Review, selected from AR Conolly’s Daily Bulletins covering Insurance, Banking, Construction & Government.
Rawson Homes Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2020] NSWSC 1654
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Henry J
Insurance – construction insurance – plaintiff was constructing residential development – hailstorm caused damaged to ‘parts of’ residential development – plaintiff sought that defendant ‘fully indemnify it’ for losses ‘sustained from the hailstorm’ under Allianz Construction Annual Policy (Policy) – extent of indemnity – ‘repair vs replace issue’ – ‘claim for certain staff related costs and associated profit margin’ – application of deductible – construction of Policy – interest claim under s57 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) – ‘date from which’ defendant should pay interest concerning ‘amount payable for’ repair vs replace issue – held: judgment for plaintiff.
View Decision
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Henry J
Insurance – construction insurance – plaintiff was constructing residential development – hailstorm caused damaged to ‘parts of’ residential development – plaintiff sought that defendant ‘fully indemnify it’ for losses ‘sustained from the hailstorm’ under Allianz Construction Annual Policy (Policy) – extent of indemnity – ‘repair vs replace issue’ – ‘claim for certain staff related costs and associated profit margin’ – application of deductible – construction of Policy – interest claim under s57 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) – ‘date from which’ defendant should pay interest concerning ‘amount payable for’ repair vs replace issue – held: judgment for plaintiff.
View Decision
Owners Corporation SP 46510 v Tan [2020] NSWSC 1564
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Robb J
Nuisance – negligence – plaintiff was proprietor of land on which property erected (OC Property) – defendant owned property which adjoined OC Property (Tan Property) – plaintiff claimed water ingress into carpark caused by ‘excavation works’ which defendant carried out on Tan Property, and by ‘state in which’ property was left following the works – held: judgment for plaintiff on nuisance claim – negligence not established.
View Decision
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Robb J
Nuisance – negligence – plaintiff was proprietor of land on which property erected (OC Property) – defendant owned property which adjoined OC Property (Tan Property) – plaintiff claimed water ingress into carpark caused by ‘excavation works’ which defendant carried out on Tan Property, and by ‘state in which’ property was left following the works – held: judgment for plaintiff on nuisance claim – negligence not established.
View Decision
Arcidiacono v The Owners Strata Plan No 17719; Arcidiacono v The Owners Strata Plan No 61233 [2020] NSWCA 269
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Macfarlan, White & McCallum JJA
Easements – respondents owned properties which adjoined ‘two small parcels of land’ (parcels) – primary judge found respondents had ‘present entitlement to ‘easements by prescription’ over parcels – primary judge held that if respondents had not had present entitlement to the easements, she would have imposed easements under s88K Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) – appellants owned ‘servient tenements’ and ‘another two adjacent allotments of land’ – appellant sought to appeal – appellants contended that requirements for establishing easements by prescription were unsatisfied – appellants also contended requirements for easements’ imposition under s88K Conveyancing Act were unsatisfied – held: leave to appeal granted – appeal dismissed.
View Decision
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Macfarlan, White & McCallum JJA
Easements – respondents owned properties which adjoined ‘two small parcels of land’ (parcels) – primary judge found respondents had ‘present entitlement to ‘easements by prescription’ over parcels – primary judge held that if respondents had not had present entitlement to the easements, she would have imposed easements under s88K Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) – appellants owned ‘servient tenements’ and ‘another two adjacent allotments of land’ – appellant sought to appeal – appellants contended that requirements for establishing easements by prescription were unsatisfied – appellants also contended requirements for easements’ imposition under s88K Conveyancing Act were unsatisfied – held: leave to appeal granted – appeal dismissed.
View Decision
Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets [2020] FCA 1493
Federal Court of Australia
Lee J
Insurance – contract – proceedings arising from observation of ’major cracks’ at ’Opal Tower’ – Icon, through Icon’s broker, ’placed third party liability insurance policies’ with Liberty and QBW – Icon sought declarations against Liberty that Incident reflected or resulted from “Occurrence” with cover period of ’Liberty Policy’ – three claims advanced in alternative against Liberty: ’Run Off Claim’ ’Statutory Extension of Coverage Claim’ and ’Rectification Claim’ – Icon sought declarations against QBE to effect Incident reflected or resulted from “Occurrence” ’in connexion with a “Product” of Icon’ within meaning of ’QBE Policy’ – s58 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) – held: Rectification Claim against Liberty succeeded – claim against QBE succeeded.
Icon
Federal Court of Australia
Lee J
Insurance – contract – proceedings arising from observation of ’major cracks’ at ’Opal Tower’ – Icon, through Icon’s broker, ’placed third party liability insurance policies’ with Liberty and QBW – Icon sought declarations against Liberty that Incident reflected or resulted from “Occurrence” with cover period of ’Liberty Policy’ – three claims advanced in alternative against Liberty: ’Run Off Claim’ ’Statutory Extension of Coverage Claim’ and ’Rectification Claim’ – Icon sought declarations against QBE to effect Incident reflected or resulted from “Occurrence” ’in connexion with a “Product” of Icon’ within meaning of ’QBE Policy’ – s58 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) – held: Rectification Claim against Liberty succeeded – claim against QBE succeeded.
Icon
Stay Informed – Connect with us on LinkedIn
Are You Underinsured? An insight into how a claim could be affected
What is underinsurance? Underinsurance is a preventable but often devastating co...
27 August, 2024Celebrating Excellence at the 2024 Strata Community CHU Awards
Celebrating Excellence at the 2024 Strata Community CHU Awards The Strata Commun...
06 August, 2024Strata Insurance Insights: Why Insurers Are Keeping An Eye On Lithium-Ion Batteries
In recent years, Australia has experienced a surge in fires linked to lithium-io...
24 July, 2024Finalists Announced for the Strata Services Business Award
Finalists Announced for the Strata Services Business Award The independent judgi...
23 July, 2024