
27 Jun Construction Law Review
Construction Law Review – June
Please refer below to our Construction Law Review, selected from AR Conolly’s Daily Bulletins covering Insurance, Banking, Construction & Government.
Bucic v Arnej Pty Ltd [2019] VSC 330
Supreme Court of Victoria
Zammit J
Negligence – occupier’s liability – causation – plaintiff working as ‘self-employed brick cleaner’ on premises injured in fall from scaffolding onto bricks – defendant sole-trader responsible for house’s construction – third party ‘hire company’ erected scaffolding – hire company settled with defendant – plaintiff claimed in negligence against defendant under Pt IIA Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) or for breach of statutory duty under Pt 3.5 Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2007 (Vic) – defendant denied breach of duty – defendant also contended that, even it did breach duty, breach was not ‘material cause’ of plaintiff’s injuries – defendant contended plaintiff’s injuries pre-existing – defendant also contended contributory negligence and ‘voluntary assumption of risk’ by plaintiff – whether breach of duty by allowing plaintiff to work on deficient scaffolding – extent to which fall ’caused or materially contributed to’ plaintiff’s conditions – ‘balance of probabilities’ – held: defendant negligent – defendant’s contentions concerning contributory negligence and voluntary assumption of risk failed – judgment for plaintiff in sum of $1,043,000.
Bucic
Supreme Court of Victoria
Zammit J
Negligence – occupier’s liability – causation – plaintiff working as ‘self-employed brick cleaner’ on premises injured in fall from scaffolding onto bricks – defendant sole-trader responsible for house’s construction – third party ‘hire company’ erected scaffolding – hire company settled with defendant – plaintiff claimed in negligence against defendant under Pt IIA Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) or for breach of statutory duty under Pt 3.5 Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2007 (Vic) – defendant denied breach of duty – defendant also contended that, even it did breach duty, breach was not ‘material cause’ of plaintiff’s injuries – defendant contended plaintiff’s injuries pre-existing – defendant also contended contributory negligence and ‘voluntary assumption of risk’ by plaintiff – whether breach of duty by allowing plaintiff to work on deficient scaffolding – extent to which fall ’caused or materially contributed to’ plaintiff’s conditions – ‘balance of probabilities’ – held: defendant negligent – defendant’s contentions concerning contributory negligence and voluntary assumption of risk failed – judgment for plaintiff in sum of $1,043,000.
Bucic
Andrews and Morrisy Developments Pty Ltd v Port Phillip City Council & Ors [2019] VSC 337
Supreme Court of Victoria
Osborn JA
Environment and planning – Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal refused to grant application planning permit for ‘multi-unit residential development’ – Tribunal found proposal inconsistent with elements of neighbourhood’s character identified by ‘zone purpose’ governing site – applicant sought to appeal, contending Tribunal erroneously failed ‘to have any or any proper regard’ to ‘transitional height control exemption’ – statutory construction – held: no failure by Tribunal failed to give exemption ‘proper effect’ – leave to appeal refused.
Andrews and Morrisy Developments
Supreme Court of Victoria
Osborn JA
Environment and planning – Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal refused to grant application planning permit for ‘multi-unit residential development’ – Tribunal found proposal inconsistent with elements of neighbourhood’s character identified by ‘zone purpose’ governing site – applicant sought to appeal, contending Tribunal erroneously failed ‘to have any or any proper regard’ to ‘transitional height control exemption’ – statutory construction – held: no failure by Tribunal failed to give exemption ‘proper effect’ – leave to appeal refused.
Andrews and Morrisy Developments
Iskra v MMIR Pty Limited [2019] NSWCA 126
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Bathurst CJ; Gleeson & Payne JJA
Security of payments – appellant was builder – appeal concerning validity of determination under s22 Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) that first respondent owner owed amount to appellant – primary judge quashed adjudication determination, finding adjudicator ‘failed to come to a view as to what was properly payable’ with regard to contract’s ‘true construction’ and claim’s ‘true merits’ – whether adjudicator determined value of construction work in payment claim – held: adjudicator determined construction’s work’s value – appeal allowed.
View Decision
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Bathurst CJ; Gleeson & Payne JJA
Security of payments – appellant was builder – appeal concerning validity of determination under s22 Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) that first respondent owner owed amount to appellant – primary judge quashed adjudication determination, finding adjudicator ‘failed to come to a view as to what was properly payable’ with regard to contract’s ‘true construction’ and claim’s ‘true merits’ – whether adjudicator determined value of construction work in payment claim – held: adjudicator determined construction’s work’s value – appeal allowed.
View Decision
Zaya v Manidis Roberts Pty Ltd v UGL Infrastructure Pty Ltd and Anor (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 515
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Campbell J
Negligence – plaintiff injured in fall down staircase at site – plaintiff sued two defendants – first defendant was head contractor and site’s occupier – second defendant was plaintiff’s employer – second defendant contracted by first defendant for ‘completion of all concreting works’ (works) – second defendant subcontracted works to company (PNT) which was not party to proceedings – whether plaintiff fell from staircase in course of employment – state of staircase’s formwork – whether ‘riser shutters had been stripped’ from all steps except the two which plaintiff complained of – whether first defendant’s ‘site supervisor’ had directed either formwork’s stripping or stripping’s cessation – whether Court accepted plaintiff’s contentions regarding ‘factual issues’ – principal’s duty to independent contractor – Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox (2009) 240 CLR 1 – employer’s duty to employee – Czatyrko v Edith Cowan University [2005] HCA 14 – held: judgment for defendants.
View Decision
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Campbell J
Negligence – plaintiff injured in fall down staircase at site – plaintiff sued two defendants – first defendant was head contractor and site’s occupier – second defendant was plaintiff’s employer – second defendant contracted by first defendant for ‘completion of all concreting works’ (works) – second defendant subcontracted works to company (PNT) which was not party to proceedings – whether plaintiff fell from staircase in course of employment – state of staircase’s formwork – whether ‘riser shutters had been stripped’ from all steps except the two which plaintiff complained of – whether first defendant’s ‘site supervisor’ had directed either formwork’s stripping or stripping’s cessation – whether Court accepted plaintiff’s contentions regarding ‘factual issues’ – principal’s duty to independent contractor – Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox (2009) 240 CLR 1 – employer’s duty to employee – Czatyrko v Edith Cowan University [2005] HCA 14 – held: judgment for defendants.
View Decision
Stay Informed – Connect with us on LinkedIn
The Rising Risk of Tobacco Retailer Tenants for Strata and Property Owners
Earlier this year we wrote an article about high-risk tenants for strata and pro...
03 December, 2024Holiday Trading and After-Hours Information
CRM Brokers wishes you and your family a very Merry Christmas and we look forwar...
04 November, 2024The Importance of Police Reference Numbers for Claims
At CRM Brokers, we are committed to making our client’s claims experience ...
30 October, 2024Are You Underinsured? An insight into how a claim could be affected
What is underinsurance? Underinsurance is a preventable but often devastating co...
27 August, 2024